Informed by a series of online surveys and a roundtable discussion, the report found that over half of those surveyed believed Free School Meal (FSM) funding was inadequate. The vast majority (83.16%) of respondents stated that the funding for FSMs should be ringfenced and the survey also confirmed that less than half of councils surveyed are providing a subsidy for their catering service (41.30%).
As well as survey analysis, the report documents the fragmentation of the English school meals sector, scrutinises the current landscape of local authority service delivery models, and affirms the local authority catering service as the most effective model for delivering nutritious school meals.
APSE’s call for action takes the form of five recommendations for national governments: ‘Your 5-a-ways to fix school meal provision’:
Speaking about the findings, Vickie Hacking, APSE Principal Advisor and lead researcher, said:
“Over the years, the local authority catering service has often been expected to be financially viable in a traded service context. As such, the wide-reaching social value of the provision of school meals and the role that councils play has been lost in the narrative.
“The provision of a hot nutritious school meal will not on its own alleviate child poverty, reduce obesity, improve the economic growth of an area or solve climate change. However, it can form a big part of the solution as the humble school meal is beneficial to the health and education of the child and supports the wider family especially during the current cost of living crisis.
“There are wider economic and social value benefits of paying predominantly part-time women workers a higher living wage and offering terms and conditions that are more generous than other employers in the sector. Working with and supporting local suppliers through procurement also generates significant social and economic benefits for the local area.”
NOTES TO EDITOR